• Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I disagree. Soviets were busy recovering from WW2 for decades while funding own allies. They were not in the position to splurge on non necessities.

    But even with that - they supplied entire population with oil, gas, electric no problems. Utilities barely cost anything even in modern russia

    • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      In the USSR, private plots owned by collective farm families, averaging 0.25 hectares in area, provided 30% of meat, vegetables and milk, 33% of eggs, and 59% of potatoes in 1979.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Bet the land was taken better care of when its a family that owns it compared to some minimum wage workers hired by a mega farm.

        • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          Yes, although I was referring to the fact that every experiment in collectivized agriculture in the 20th century boils down to: A minuscule percentage of the plots were left to private initiative and those plots account for the majority of the total output.