• Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    They’re not good at debugging. The article is pretty spot on, IMO - they’re great at doing the work; but you are still the brain. You’re still deciding what to do, and maybe 50% of the time how to do it, you’re just not executing the lowest level anymore. Similar for debugging - this is not an exercise at the lowest level, and needs you to run it.

    • hisao@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      deciding what to do, and maybe 50% of the time how to do it, you’re just not executing the lowest level anymore

      And that’s exactly what I want. And I don’t get it why people want more. Having more means you have less and less control or influence on the result. What I want is that in other fields it becomes like it is in programming now, so that you micromanage every step and have great control over the result.