• BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Listen, Pythagoras gives us the hands down best way to tell intelligent life visiting earth that we’re intelligent. Drawing a right triangle and marking the sides with 3 dots, 4 dots, and 5 dots immediately demonstrates that we are a sapient species that has developed mathematics with no need for a device or language. Of course, we’re all carrying devices these days, so maybe that’s no longer relevant.

    • RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      If we ever do met intelligent alien life, there’s no guarantee such a thing will make any sense to them.

      I mean, for one, they may not have eyes to see your drawing among a million other likely faulty assumptions in your scenario.

      • Uli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        But if they evolved to be right triangles with their sides marked by three dots, four dots, and five dots, then the message will be spot on.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If they can’t “see”, then how would they ever travel intergalacticly? Seriously, they’ve have some form of sight sense, even if it’s braille.

        And the point is that math is indeed universal. The ratio of a triangle will never change. And again, if you’re a space fairing civilization,you’d have figured out triangles. You’re confusing differences in culture with basic rules of the universe. It’d be like saying “what if they don’t know what gravity is?” like they just somehow float around because they’re ignorant of the laws of gravity.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            No, it’s not a typo. I’m pointing out that even if they have no eyes, they’d still have sensory input and within that input you’d still find “visual descriptions”. You can still describe something as square or round or “emanates this wavelength of light” or “this object is 5m away from me” without eyes. Eyes are not a prerequisite for describing things and if they are space fairing, they’ve figured out something. You wouldn’t be able to build a ship without some system in place. So sure, they may be vastly different, but some common things have to exist. And math will always be one of those. Change your number system and ratios still stay the same.