• cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    It also needs to fail gracefully. A smart switch needs to fail to a dumb switch, not “no switch”.

    • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      and retire gracefully, where the device becomes open source and available to the community of owners who have invested in it.

    • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re absolutely correct. I have few smart switches around the house and automations for yard lights and stuff like that are pretty nice to have but I still have the physical switch where the dumb switch was to interact with if the automations are down or I just want to override them. The ones I use even accept the same faceplate than traditional ones so there’s no change on anything unless you want to automate things.