• Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    After so many years, can’t say I understood the appeal of facial recognition on a phone. You’re already going to be holding it so fingerprint readers still seem superior in every way. You can unlock it before you even take it out of your pocket too.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Fingerprint readers require touching a specific spot with a specific digit.

      Face recognition only requires the user be looking at the device.

      The bigger argument is fingerprint readers can be more secure.

      I personally would prefer a device that does both simultaneously for secure requests like accessing credentials.

      • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So make the reader area bigger and allow people to add all their digits. I think when the iPhone had the home button the reader accepted 10 fingers.

    • Ilandar@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I think it’s mostly a combination of a Apple pushing it + people having a singular bad experience with the fingerprint reader on some cheap/old phone and assuming all fingerprint readers are like that.

  • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Finally in the near future we’ll get rid of stupid holes in the screen.

  • tfowinder@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Hole free camera androids already exists.

    Se xiaomi popup camera phones