This doesn't cut it
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Edward@lemmy.4d2.org to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 hours ago

Can reading assholes be considered science?

lemmy.4d2.org

message-square
13
fedilink
96

Can reading assholes be considered science?

lemmy.4d2.org

Edward@lemmy.4d2.org to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 hours ago
message-square
13
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Can’t you just read X instead?

  • Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Isn’t that what Sylvester Stallone’s mom did for a living?

  • Alexander@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Mighty Shai-hulud!

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

  • TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m a reading asshole, am I a science?

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Your bumhole tells me you’re a skeptical. So I probably can’t interest you in a great wrinkle- removing miracle-cream? A smoother hole begets a healthier life, a higher libido and more financial stability in life.

  • Hackworth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    From the chaote perspective, any dynamic system with chaotic properties can be used for divination. But a science? Nah.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I can tell by the flavour that a new love interest will come into your life imminently.

  • Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Not any more than palm reading is a science (it’s not.) It could be considered an art I suppose, but science needs to be things that can be tested and produce repeatable results.

  • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “Science” has a rather strict “scientific” definition. Predictability, repeatability, etc. I don’t remember details.

  • OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It depends on whether the asshole has a title of Professor.

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    It can be considered pseudoscience. The question is - do we want to consider it at all?

    • HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Some people would. You know, for science.

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.01K users / day
  • 6.44K users / week
  • 11.7K users / month
  • 24.2K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 15.7K subscribers
  • 3.12K Posts
  • 36.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org