ikidd@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agosystemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated successblog.tjll.netexternal-linkmessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up1300arrow-down149 cross-posted to: linux@programming.devlinux@programming.dev
arrow-up1251arrow-down1external-linksystemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated successblog.tjll.netikidd@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square118fedilink cross-posted to: linux@programming.devlinux@programming.dev
minus-squareMagiilaro@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·13 hours agoI am not seeing how IBM and/or Microsoft are winning anything here or how systemd enables them to take over Linux. But maybe I am missing something. Last time I checked (60 seconds ago) systemd was using FOSS licences for all it’s code. So it seems to be living the FOSS culture, or not? I am always open to learn and correct my view on things under new information, so if you can provide them I am open to read it.
I am not seeing how IBM and/or Microsoft are winning anything here or how systemd enables them to take over Linux. But maybe I am missing something.
Last time I checked (60 seconds ago) systemd was using FOSS licences for all it’s code. So it seems to be living the FOSS culture, or not?
I am always open to learn and correct my view on things under new information, so if you can provide them I am open to read it.