• Link@rentadrunk.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong but fax isn’t end to end encrypted so how is it deemed more secure than email which also isn’t end to end encrypted (by default).

    • projectmoon@forum.agnos.is
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Probably a case of legislative inertia and tried-and-true practices. It’s also a thing that’s mostly limited to the US, I feel like. I want to say many other Western countries have digital systems in place (maybe not the BEST digital systems, but something better than fax).

      Fax is not end-to-end encrypted. Not even sure it’s encrypted in transit. But it is also something that doesn’t rely on a third party provider storing all your data indefinitely and then losing it all in a data breach. Of course, that doesn’t stop people from hooking up to a virtual fax service that might store info on a server… but still…

    • thesystemisdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I suppose it has more to do with the opportunity for a significant breach. The healthcare provider’s email system is a big target full of exploits. Fax is also HIPPAHIPAA compliant, email is not.

      • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Fax is also HIPPA compliant, email is not.

        Yeah I just love having my cancer diagnosis sent in plaintext over copper wire such that anyone with a dollar store audio recorder and physical access to the wire can intercept. If there’s one thing 19th century data transmission tech is known for, it’s security and privacy.

        Is it too much to ask that hospitals use the literally decades old AES standard for sending medical data?