• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Sources for what, exactly? What is “fantasming”? The title of the article you posted is “Criminalization of encryption”. The Guardian is using encryption to send messages, so why would they be exempt? In fact, why would any internet use at all not be criminalized? It’s all encrypted.

    • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      So you read the title and you know everything. There is a liste of what they are accusing and their is no mention of internet

      The elements of the investigation that have been communicated to us are staggering. Here are just some of the practices that are being misused as evidence of terrorist behavior6:

      – the use of applications such as Signal, WhatsApp, Wire, Silence or ProtonMail to encrypt communications ;

      – using Internet privacy tools such as VPN, Tor or Tails7 ;

      – protecting ourselves against the exploitation of our personal data by GAFAM via services such as /e/OS, LineageOS, F-Droid ;

      – encrypting digital media;

      – organizing and participating in digital hygiene training sessions;

      – simple possession of technical documentation.

      But continue to invent reality. What are fact if not debatable point of view ? That the end for me. Have a great day.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t know everything. Just because it’s not explicitly listed today doesn’t mean it won’t be tomorrow. This was just created yesterday. And it does the same thing that all of those listed apps do: facilitates private communication.