The carbon footprint, like the ecological footprint, is an average proxy for wealth. Wealth is political.

How are we to win the hearts and minds of these people by saying we intend to take their solid livelihoods?

Yes, that is a good question. Here’s another:

How are we to win the hearts and minds of these people by lying about their responsibility in the predicament? “Oh, it’s not you, it’s just this small group of billionaires which you admire want to replace!”

You don’t work with the people who want in on the suicidal game. The optimists need to be brought into reality, that’s something to work on. But for the psychos, you work around them, you around against them, not with them.

How could it not be political?

It’s a shame that I can’t downvote you across this federated connection.

Can’t say that the next dark age was accidental.

highway

giant gaping wound in the ecosystem

I converted my entire photo archive to WebP. No regrets.

I had a portable floppy drive for years, but it was useless.

Not just climate, but shit. Shit from humans and the animal harming industry.

Nutrient-rich fertiliser and slurry run-off from farms supplying mega-firms like chicken processor Moy Park are being blamed for contributing to the pollution.

“but muh local eggs and nuggets”

Untreated sewage spills and septic tank effluent are also suspected.

People living on shores like that should be checked weekly, if constructions are even allowed on the shores of lakes like a drinking water reservoir. To me, it’s insane that people are allowed near the drinking water. We’ve figured out that it’s bad to allow animals near crops, especially horticultural crops; we’ve figured out that people who food production and processing should be done in hygienic systems; but we somehow can’t figure out that it’s BAD so allow some dipshits to live or play in the drinking reservoir.

A: was for saving 💾.

Don’t fly :)

I’m looking forward to MS buying OpenAI, probably next year. It’s going to be very funny.

O(n^n)

If you want rain inland, you need more forests. Europe’s tradition of deforestation for pastures and feed crop land is going to have to be reversed.

You can turn off AI/datacenters. If you try to turn off humans on a large scale, it’s called genocide.

Some of the trees in that forest are around 700 years age. This tells you there isn’t a natural fire cycle at all. Historically there were essentially no fires ever, not even every few hundred years. Never, never. That’s over now.

Thanks. I’m so tired of all the climate denial hidden under “pyroscape” ecology.

#frostration

Now with Co-Pilot slop comments

Delicious either way.

Just use ===