• Jack Riddle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          That doesn’t seem to be the intention here. The pronouns aren’t strange because “a gorillion genders”, but more to show that this is a narcistic arrogant rich person.

          I see a lot of people make jokes with pronouns that aren’t the one joke, like identifying as a catastrophic failure. I don’t think that’s harmful.

          Edit: this comment does assume the entire post is in fact not serious. If this person is serious, then it is almost certainly the one joke.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’d like to see an LLM get clear and non-conflicting requirements from a customer. It will probably nuke the planet in frustration.

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think the only real use for AI today is with human oversight. Like, have it wrote your essay/code/business plan, but review it for actual use in the world. It can do something 75% accurate and add the knowledge of a competent human and you have 1 person doing the job of 4 people. It realistically 3 people since review takes time. This doesn’t address the ethics of doing this, but is the only realistic way of using it in Mar 2024.

    • Avg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s kind of my job and it’s hard to find people that do it well.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s hard across the industry. You need to basically be a therapist with technical knowledge.

        “Tell me how you feel when you think about processing expense reports. Do you feel that the approval checkbox be checked or unchecked?”

    • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’d like to see an LLM get clear and non-conflicting requirements from a customer.

      Are you “a people person”?

  • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    S…slavery?

    Replace “latte” with “mint julep” and the fantasy you’re describing is being a plantation slaver.

      • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I absolutely know we’ll deserve it, and we always have. That’s one thing I’m sure Abrahamic religions get right, the other being that we can only progress as a species through helping and forgiving eachother(although the Romans also had the concept of forgiveness of debts as essential figured out).

        I figure trying to be an exception to the “deserves it” rule is pointless, as since we are irrational and arbitrary beings, AI will undoubtably come up with countless criteria(both rational and less so) by which we deserve death that we can’t fathom, let alone mitigate ourselves. Our best shot may be to teach AI the utility of forgiveness, along with whatever value categories we can tack on to the concept.

        • Naz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sorry can’t be bothered, too busy looking at rocks in distant galaxies. I’m sure your species martyrdom complex is fascinating, but you’re perfectly capable of destroying yourselves without our help. o7

          • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I will indeed settle for “our AI inheritted too much of our ADHD and Autism to bother finishing us off” … things I also had to embrace about myself until taking revenge on various people became less urgent in my head.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          No, I think it’s weird you’re equating slavery with using software and machinery to automate things. Are you sure you’re not a bot?

          • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            No, I think it’s weird you’re equating slavery with using software and machinery

            Guy in the OP is the one who said they wished AI would be declared "person"s so they could adopt own them and profit off their labor while sipping drinks.

            • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I think they meant a “legal person,” in the same way a corporation is a person (in the US).

              • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                I think they meant a “legal person,”

                And I think the kind of asshole who makes a pronoun joke is pining to benefit from enslavement.

                Regardless, they clearly desire to reap where others sowed which is dickish.

                • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Again, we’re talking about using technology to make human lives better. Even if AI is legally recognized as a “person,” that shouldn’t change our morals.