• onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do people think that having 4 criminal cases pending against you is meaningless? Like… This is accurate and prosecutions are moving forward. The fuck do you want? That’s how it works.

    • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. Its a slow process.

      They are collecting evidence. Witness statements and such.

      They are NOT rushing this. It would be a shitshow.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He stole from charities and comitted a plethora of other crimes, if the DOJ was doing their job, he should never have been in a position to campaign for president in the first place.

    • BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are a lot of people in this thread who became legal experts by passing the Reddit bar exam, or something of equally imaginary significance.

      • infyrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The same people who think the word ‘allegedly’ means confirmation of guilt.

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah obviously.

        But the day before he got convicted? 2 days after that, or hell, years ago, no complicated feelings at all.

        I would feel like he somehow died to get out of being convicted lmao

        • explodicle@local106.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if he gets convicted, I wouldn’t put it past a centrist Democrat to pardon him for unity or some bullshit.

            • explodicle@local106.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t think the left would be very surprised, we’d just keep focusing on direct action. Centrist Democrats already DGAF if we’re mad.

              Liberals would call it “unacceptable” for a few months, maybe do a couple protests, and then continue to vote for the people who got him pardoned.

              Nothing would change.

              • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Isn’t anyone disturbed by that? Without extreme action from the left and no legal pushback from the Democrats, that would mean the right could do whatever the hell it wants without consequence, including genocide.

                Why aren’t we overthrowing them?

                • explodicle@local106.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They already got away with indigenous genocide without consequence, so I can certainly believe it.

                  Overthrowing them is a huge prisoner’s dilemma. We can barely even discuss specifics without getting the whole instance censored. The first person to fire a shot would likely act alone, and spend the rest of their life in prison.

                  I think the most realistic solution is p2p assassination markets built on top of blockchains, like Bitcoin Hivemind. That would avoid centralized organizations for which the leaders/admins are easy to bribe or threaten.

                  We’ve already seen what they do to our heroes. Don’t be a hero.

  • Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’ve been saying shit since he got elected. Like honestly, shit or get off the pot.

    • Perfide@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Criminal investigations take time under the best of circumstances. These are not the best of circumstances.

    • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, you can’t arrest a sitting president, and Senate was majority Republican and they tow the party line so yeah most Democrats could do was impeach and let the Republicans bail him out

      But now he’s not president, and has to face the courts as a citizen. The investigators aren’t going to rush a case like this, but you also can’t risk it going over to the election before getting a conviction. Honestly the timing on all this seems pretty on point

  • torafugu@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It will soon get to the point to where he’ll spend life in prison, if it isn’t already at that point.

  • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Look, this isn’t half-life 3 we’re talking about here. It’s going to happen, just keep your pants on.

    • cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you dream of one day conviction? Interlinked.

      Within cells interlinked?

      Why don’t you say that three times: Within cells interlinked.

    • BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s Dr. Manhattan from The Watchmen I believe. I could be wrong though since it’s been decades since I last read it.

      • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s been decades since I last read it. Yep, that´s why I -after looking at it for a second- took it for another untypical superhero comic, that I also read decades ago and that looks a little similar :)