• bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      In practice that is zero - you are not allowed to take off unless you have enough fuel to fly for an hour after landing. flying is safe in large part because of hard learned rules like this.

      • kcuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’ve never seen a rule requiring any specific fuel reserve except for when filing IFR where you need enough fuel to get to your destination, and alternate, and still have 45 minutes of fuel.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          that depends on the pilot. it doesn’t apply to bold pilots. There are bold pilots and old pilots - but no old and bold pilots.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    If it’s a flying CAR, how come it has to be towed to and from it’s designated take off and landing sites? The whole point of a flying car is that you can go from ground travel to air travel without much effort.

    This isn’t a expensive flying car. It’s a cheap aircraft that an inexperienced and untrained pilot is going to be allowed to fly if they can cough up $200k.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There is no legal definition for a flying car, so they can use the term if they want. It’s like the term AI that gets thrown around a lot, but actually people mean an LLM, but technically even a checkers program is in the AI category.

      The USA industry term is a “roadable aircraft” and legal is also moving to that term. In Europe the legal term is FlyDrive vehicle. And the thing in the article is an SC-VTOL (special condition) in Europe and powered-lift aircraft in USA.

  • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The only thing I consider to be a flying car is when the technology is completely different from what we have now.

    Tired of these plane/copter/drone-type vehicles that they claim are also cars.

    We need Star Wars/Fifth Element/Back to the Future II/Blade Runner-type vehicles.

  • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Buyers don’t need a pilot’s license to operate the aircraft, though they must complete training and take an FAA knowledge test.

    That’s absolutely fucking insane. How did the FAA approve this? The only saving grace here is that the $200k price tag means few, if any, will be sold to random idiots who want a flying car.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s an ultralight. You don’t need a pilots license to fly one in the US. You can even build one yourself if you want to. You don’t even need any inspection or airworthiness certificate. Since they can’t legally be flown over populated areas, it’s unlikely for anyone except the pilot to get injured or killed.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      There are lots of fairly standard high end cars that go for more money than that. So the potential is quite high for these to sell well

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It also means the people operating them will have a high threshold for consequences and maybe not care so much about the community.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I can’t wait until some influencer is half way from LA to Vegas when the low battery dummy light comes on.

    • Badabinski@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      As someone posted elsewhere, this is an ultralight aircraft and is therefore forbidden from flying over populated areas.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Oh that’s good news. However their stated business model is in cities so I expect heavy lobbying to lift that ban to start. It could be worthwhile to have layered bans at different levels of government to provide protection in case one layer gets paid off.