This is the most ridiculous topic/attack in the history of cybersecurity.
A LLM can be used to accuse someone without proof that their TLS traffic is on a banned/blackmailable topic.
The way TLS works is that the actual LLM provider gets all of your decrypted traffic. They are already encouraged by government/NSA/political in groups/Mossad to share anything of interest, or to datamine for future considerations of interest.
Even if this training dataset gets a 98% correct rate on whether you are a pervert, that should only be good enough to serve you ads for boner pills, until the minority report dystopia, just uses it against its political enemies.
This is the most ridiculous topic/attack in the history of cybersecurity.
A LLM can be used to accuse someone without proof that their TLS traffic is on a banned/blackmailable topic.
The way TLS works is that the actual LLM provider gets all of your decrypted traffic. They are already encouraged by government/NSA/political in groups/Mossad to share anything of interest, or to datamine for future considerations of interest.
Even if this training dataset gets a 98% correct rate on whether you are a pervert, that should only be good enough to serve you ads for boner pills, until the minority report dystopia, just uses it against its political enemies.