• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thing is, when the economy is already going downhill… You ought to increase government spending instead of reducing it. It puts more money in the economy. More people with jobs also spend more money at businesses that employ people.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      There is an argument to be made that having secure high paying government jobs harms other sectors by taking employees and raising average pay, forcing them to keep up. We aren’t anywhere near that being an issue though, but there is a limit where more government jobs can make recovery harder, when other sectors go out of business competing with it and there’s nowhere for anyone to go once the government jobs close.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well unfortunately the President of the United States is bad at business and the Republicans are …Republicans. The only thing that matters to either are rich people.

      • GorGor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        He is a moron to be sure, but crashes like this make opportunities for those with means to gobble up the big stuff cheap. Sure ground beef is expensive as fuck right now but I bet the wagu steak hasn’t changed nearly as much. Hell when the economy is going well the rabble want a taste of the good stuff. Better to keep them in their place.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Oh I know, I’m just fully enjoying the irony of watching the man who was supposed to lower the grocery prices make fewer people be able to afford groceries.

  • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    High level workers, it’s like Christmas for oversea companies. Keep forcing them to migrate because they’re definitely worth it.

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    According to the article, it is due to restructuring that has nothing to do with the spite layoffs being used by the Trump administration to punish Democrats for their unwillingness to support a dramatic 2x increase to healthcare expenses for Americans.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      AFAIK JPL is part of the University of California, not NASA and I’m pretty sure this isn’t the first round of layoffs at JPL in the last few years.

      Edit: It’s Caltech. I misremembered.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I misremembered, but my point still stands; the decision for layoffs, this being the third round in 18 months, didn’t come from the government it came from JPLs management which isn’t NASA.

            • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              How? My point was that management decisions regarding JPL don’t come from NASA. Misremembering the institution doesn’t negate the point I was making.

              • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                of course it does. nasa pays the bills and they are the ones who say “we will hire or fire people, because we do or do not have money”. management from caltech says “ok, these are the people who have expertise we need”.

                you don’t think they are giving money to someone and that someone does whatever they want with these money, do you?

                • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 hours ago

                  That’s literally how think tanks work. Their paychecks come from Caltech not NASA. They answer to the board of governors not NASA. But you also seem to have forgotten the context of the original comment I was replying to.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mich easier to just write a cheque of money money to Elon. I hear he likes taking public money 💰💰💰.