skepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 months agoChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up173arrow-down1external-linkChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comskepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square63fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoDo you think my comments are wrong because I haven’t read the book?
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoYou want to judge something you don’t know. That’s never a good idea.
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI don’t judge the book. I judge the situation of a war by a summary of an analysis of the geostrategic relevance of the area.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoWhy are you regularly referring to this precise book?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoSo that others can see how the experts analyse the situation.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoDo you agree with the book?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoIn which way? The original book or the adjusted part of the reprint? With the given assumptions I think the book does a reasonable analysis.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoHow would you know if you haven’t read it?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThat depends on what you are asking.
Do you think my comments are wrong because I haven’t read the book?
You want to judge something you don’t know. That’s never a good idea.
I don’t judge the book. I judge the situation of a war by a summary of an analysis of the geostrategic relevance of the area.
Why are you regularly referring to this precise book?
So that others can see how the experts analyse the situation.
Do you agree with the book?
In which way? The original book or the adjusted part of the reprint?
With the given assumptions I think the book does a reasonable analysis.
How would you know if you haven’t read it?
That depends on what you are asking.