There is no question about Taiwan’s status today. Only an authoritarian regime’s denial of a reality its ideology finds inconvenient.

[Op-ed by Roy Chun Lee, Taiwan’s Ambassador to the EU and Belgium.]

Archived

[…]

Over the past 130 years, the people of Taiwan have cultivated a unique identity with a multicultural heritage, drawing not only from Chinese influences but also from the Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, and Taiwan’s indigenous peoples, who are widely regarded to be the origin of all Austronesian cultures. Like the identity-building process of most European countries, Taiwan’s journey has been a mixture of darkness and light, suffering and joy, struggle and triumph.

Yet these elements are exactly what make the Taiwanese identity unique and render it a special, like-minded partner to Europe and the world, with or without formal diplomatic recognition.

[…]

Unfortunately, instead of applauding Taiwan, the PRC has continually employed every available method to deny the existence of Taiwan. One of the most frequently used tools is to distort the meaning of UN Resolution 2758, arguing that the Resolution reflects a global consensus that Taiwan is part of the PRC.

This is fake news. The following is a direct quotation from a speech delivered by European Commissioner Nicolas Schmit, on behalf of EU High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell in October 2024: “United Nations Resolution 2758 is very short - only 150 words. And among those 150 words, the word ‘Taiwan’ does not appear. The resolution switched representation in the United Nations from the ‘representatives of Chiang Kai-shek’ to the ‘representatives of the Government of the People’s Republic of China’”.

In short, Resolution 2758 provides no legal basis for the PRC to claim ownership of Taiwan or to deny the fact that Taiwan has existed as a sovereign, independent, and meaningful country for the last 75 years.

[…]

Europe can help deter coercion in the Taiwan Strait.

  • First, face the facts: Taiwan is a democracy whose sovereignty is exercised and enjoyed every day by its 23 million people. No amount of propaganda can erase that reality.

  • Second, expose and resist coercion: Call out and reject the PRC’s disinformation campaigns, economic blackmail, and military intimidation whenever and wherever they appear.

  • And third, invest in partnership: Expand trade, technology, security dialogues, and cultural exchanges with Taiwan, so that shared values can become shared resilience.

[…]

  • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 day ago

    They speak mandarin

    So China will be part of Taiwan then?

    And Xinjiang and Tibet will become independent countries then, as they speak Uyghur and Tibetic languages rather than Mandarin? Right?

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      To the best of my understanding, the big joke of the “one China” policy is precisely the “yes” to that first one.

      Though that second one never occurred to me: Xinjiang was more or less held from the Qing onwards, but does the ROC actually even claim Tibet?

      • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Xinjiang has been an independent nation with a great culture long before modern China was even founded.

        • Aqarius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yes, but was, IIRC, under KMT during WW2. Tibet wasn’t re-occupied until after 1949. I know ROC, on paper, claim three more dashes. It would be amusing if they claimed one less Tibet.

    • g7s@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      So China will be part of Taiwan then

      If they had the military power, I bet ;)

      • Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        @g7s@feddit.org

        If they had the military power, I bet ;)

        What does that mean? First, you say it is about the common language. If this logic doesn’t hold, it is about military power?